and
It then follows that :
We then have this schematic presentation of the above ranges , on a [ logarithmic scale basis ] , as per this diagram below .

and
Let us now denote this partciular Geometric Mean as the value [ G ] , i.e. :
| Category | GeometricMean | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| ************** | ************** | ************************ |
| Category II | 454.91 | the square of [ 21.3286 ] |
| Category III | 9702.51 | the cube of [ 21.3286 ] |
| Category IV | 20 6941.00 | the 4th-power of [ 21.3286 ] |
| Category V | 441 3761.81 | the 5th-power of [ 21.3286 ] |
We then have this schematic presentation of the above Geometric Means

And that-is-to-say :
and
any one prime-number cannot be favored over another here when the [ derived category ] is viewed on an overall basis .
Thus , for the 10 derived [ Category II Compositive Numbers ] here involving exactly 20 [ prime factors ] ,
Consequently , the Geometric Mean of all derived { Category II Composite Numbers } must necessarily be :
yielding :
Therefore :
Thus , for the 20 derived [ Category III Compositive Numbers ] here involving exactly 60 [ prime factors ] ,
Consequently , the Geometric Mean of all derived { Category III Composite Numbers } must necessarily be :
yielding :
Therefore :
Thus , for the 35 derived [ Category IV Compositive Numbers ] here involving exactly 140 [ prime factors ] ,
Consequently , the Geometric Mean of all derived { Category IV Composite Numbers } must necessarily be :
yielding :
Therefore :

We shall therefore do another round of [ Core Structural Pattern ] propagations using the six (6) prime numbers ,
in an attempt to bring out some of the { Symmetry and Counter-Flow features }